首页> 外文OA文献 >GPs' views on the practice of physician-assisted suicide and their role in proposed UK legalisation: a qualitative study
【2h】

GPs' views on the practice of physician-assisted suicide and their role in proposed UK legalisation: a qualitative study

机译:全科医生对医生协助自杀行为的看法及其在拟议的英国合法化中的作用:定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background A bill to legalise assisted dying in the UK has been proposed in Parliament's House of Lords three times since 2003. The House of Lords Select Committee concluded in 2005 that 'the few attempts to understand the basis of doctors' views have shown equivocal data varying over time'. Fresh research was recommended to gain a fuller understanding of health sector views. Aim To examine GPs' views of the practice of physician-assisted suicide as defined by the 2005/2006 House of Lords (Joffe) Bill and views of their role in the proposed legislation; and to explore the influences determining GPs' views on physician-assisted suicide. Design of study Qualitative interview study. Setting Primary care in South London, England. Method Semi-structured interviews with GPs were conducted by a lead interviewer and analysed in a search for themes, using the framework approach. Results Thirteen GPs were interviewed. GPs who had not personally witnessed terminal suffering that could justify assisted dying were against the legislation. Some GPs felt their personal religious views, which regarded assisted dying as morally wrong, could not be the basis of a generalisable medical ethic for others. GPs who had witnessed a person's suffering that, in their opinion, justified physician-assisted suicide were in favour of legislative change. Some GPs felt a specialist referral pathway to provide assisted dying would help to ensure proper standards were met. Conclusion GPs' views on physician-assisted suicide ranged from support to opposition, depending principally on their interpretation of their experience of patients' suffering at the end of life. The goal to lessen suffering of the terminally ill, and apprehensions about patients being harmed, were common to both groups. Respect for autonomy and the right of self-determination versus the need to protect vulnerable people from the potential for harm from social coercion were the dominant themes.
机译:背景资料自2003年以来,英国国会上议院曾三度提出一项将英国辅助染病合法化的法案。上议院House选委员会于2005年得出结论,“鲜有了解医生观点基础的尝试表明模棱两可的数据各不相同随着时间的推移'。建议进行新的研究,以更全面地了解卫生部门的观点。目的审查全科医生对《 2005/2006上议院(乔夫)法案》所定义的医生协助自杀行为的看法,以及他们在拟议立法中的作用的看法;并探讨影响决定全科医生对医生协助自杀的看法的影响。研究设计定性访谈研究。在英国伦敦南部设置初级保健。方法由一位主要访谈员对全科医生进行半结构化访谈,并使用框架方法对主题进行搜索分析。结果采访了13名全科医生。没有亲眼目睹可以证明辅助死亡正当的绝症的全科医生违反了法律。一些全科医生认为他们的个人宗教观点(认为辅助死亡在道德上是错误的)不能成为其他人普遍适用的医学道德的基础。亲眼目睹某人遭受痛苦的全科医生认为他们有正当的医生协助自杀,这有利于立法改革。一些家庭医生认为,通过专家转诊途径来提供辅助的染病将有助于确保达到适当的标准。结论全科医生对医生协助自杀的观点从支持到反对不等,主要取决于他们对患者生命终末痛苦经历的解释。两组患者都希望达到减轻晚期病人痛苦和对患者受伤的忧虑的目标。首要主题是尊重自治和自决权,以及保护弱势群体免受社会胁迫带来的潜在危害的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号